Why go back? Assisted return from Norway
Type
Étude
Pays
Norvège,
Afghanistan,
Iraq,
Éthiopie,
Fédération de Russie,
Kosovo sous administration des Nations Unies (résolution 1244 du Conseil de sécurité)
Région
Espace économique européen,
Asie et Pacifique,
Afrique de l’Est et Corne de l’Afrique,
Europe de l’Est et du Sud-Est et Asie centrale,
Moyen-Orient et Afrique du Nord
Organisation
Institute for Social Research
Année
2015
Language
Anglais
Publication Series
Report 2015:08
Governments in reception countries embrace (voluntary) assisted returns for several reasons. Such returns are seen as more humane, less costly and they spark less controversy than forced returns. For the rejected migrants themselves, voluntary assisted return is often seen as one of several unappealing alternatives. This study is based on two sources of data: interviews with employees at reception centers and key informants (NGOs, civil servants), and register data encompassing 105,000 third-country nationals. This material opens for a combined quantitative and qualitative analysis.
Link to download file